Lp space
作者： 发布时间：20130128 10:41:20 浏览次数：640
L^{p} space(only for study)
In mathematics, the L^{p} spaces are function spaces defined using a natural generalization of the pnorm for finitedimensional vector spaces. They are sometimes called Lebesgue spaces, named after Henri Lebesgue (Dunford & Schwartz 1958, III.3), although according to Bourbaki (1987) they were first introduced by Riesz (1910). L^{p} spaces form an important class of Banach spaces in functional analysis, and of topological vector spaces. Lebesgue spaces have applications in physics, statistics, finance, engineering, and other disciplines.
Contents[hide] 
[edit]The pnorm in finite dimensions
The length of a vector x = (x_{1}, x_{2}, …, x_{n}) in the ndimensional real vector space R^{n} is usually given by the Euclidean norm:
The Euclidean distance between two points x and y is the length of the straight line between the two points. In many situations, the Euclidean distance is insufficient for capturing the actual distances in a given space. For example, taxi drivers in Manhattan should measure distance not in terms of the length of the straight line to their destination, but in terms of the Manhattan distance, which takes into account that streets are either orthogonal or parallel to each other. The class ofpnorms generalizes these two examples and has an abundance of applications in many parts of mathematics, physics, and computer science.
[edit]Definition
For a real number p ≥ 1, the pnorm or L^{p}norm of x is defined by
The Euclidean norm from above falls into this class and is the 2norm, and the 1norm is the norm that corresponds to theManhattan distance.
The L^{∞}norm or maximum norm (or uniform norm) is the limit of the L^{p}norms for . It turns out that this limit is equivalent to the following definition:
For all p ≥ 1, the pnorms and maximum norm as defined above indeed satisfy the properties of a "length function" (or norm), which are that:
 only the zero vector has zero length,
 the length of the vector is positive homogeneous with respect to multiplication by a scalar, and
 the length of the sum of two vectors is no larger than the sum of lengths of the vectors (triangle inequality).
Abstractly speaking, this means that R^{n} together with the pnorm is a Banach space. This Banach space is the L^{p}space over R^{n}.
[edit]Relations between pnorms
It is intuitively clear that straightline distances in Manhattan are generally shorter than taxi distances. Formally, this means that the Euclidean norm of any vector is bounded by its 1norm:
This fact generalizes to pnorms in that the pnorm of any given vector x does not grow with p:
 for any vector x and real numbers p ≥ 1 and a ≥ 0.
For the opposite direction, the following relation between the 1norm and the 2norm is known:
This inequality depends on the dimension n of the underlying vector space and follows directly from the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality.
[edit]When 0 < p < 1
In R^{n} for n > 1, the formula
defines an absolutely homogeneous function for 0 < p < 1; however, the resulting function does not define an Fnorm, because it is not subadditive. InR^{n} for n > 1, the formula for 0 < p < 1
defines a subadditive function, which does define an Fnorm. This Fnorm is not homogeneous.
However, the function
defines a metric. The metric space (R^{n}, d_{p}) is denoted by ℓ_{n}^{p}.
Although the punit ball B_{n}^{p} around the origin in this metric is "concave", the topology defined on R^{n} by the metric d_{p} is the usual vector space topology of R^{n}, hence ℓ_{n}^{p} is a locally convex topological vector space. Beyond this qualitative statement, a quantitative way to measure the lack of convexity of ℓ_{n}^{p} is to denote by C_{p}(n) the smallest constant C such that the multiple C B_{n}^{p} of the punit ball contains the convex hull of B_{n}^{p}, equal to B_{n}^{1}. The fact that C_{p}(n) = n^{1/p – 1}tends to infinity with n (for fixed p < 1) reflects the fact that the infinitedimensional sequence space ℓ^{p} defined below, is no longer locally convex.
[edit]When p = 0
There is one l_{0} norm and another function called the l_{0} "norm" (with scare quotation marks).
The mathematical definition of the l_{0} norm was established by Banach's Theory of Linear Operations. The space of sequences has a complete metric topology provided by the Fnorm , which is discussed by Stefan Rolewicz in Metric Linear Spaces.^{[1]} The l_{0}normed space is studied in functional analysis, probability theory, and harmonic analysis.
Another function was called the l_{0} "norm" by David Donoho, whose quotation marks warn that this function is not a proper norm is the number of nonzero entries of the vector x. Many authors abuse terminology by omitting the quotation marks. Defining 0^{0} = 0, the zero "norm" of x is equal to . This is not a norm (Bnorm, with "B" for Banach) because it is not homogeneous. Despite these defects as a mathematical norm, the nonzero counting "norm" has uses in scientific computing, information theory, and statistics – notably in compressed sensing in signal processing and computational harmonic analysis.
[edit]The pnorm in countably infinite dimensions

For more details on this topic, see Sequence space.
The pnorm can be extended to vectors that have an infinite number of components, which yields the space . This contains as special cases:
 , the space of sequences whose series is absolutely convergent,
 , the space of squaresummable sequences, which is a Hilbert space, and
 , the space of bounded sequences.
The space of sequences has a natural vector space structure by applying addition and scalar multiplication coordinate by coordinate. Explicitly, for an infinitesequence of real (or complex) numbers, define the vector sum to be
while the scalar action is given by
Define the pnorm
Here, a complication arises, namely that the series on the right is not always convergent, so for example, the sequence made up of only ones, (1, 1, 1, …), will have an infinite pnorm (length) for every finite p ≥ 1. The space ℓ^{p} is then defined as the set of all infinite sequences of real (or complex) numbers such that the pnorm is finite.
One can check that as p increases, the set ℓ^{p} grows larger. For example, the sequence
is not in ℓ^{1}, but it is in ℓ^{p} for p > 1, as the series
diverges for p = 1 (the harmonic series), but is convergent for p > 1.
One also defines the ∞norm using the supremum:
and the corresponding space ℓ^{∞} of all bounded sequences. It turns out that see^{[2]}
if the righthand side is finite, or the lefthand side is infinite. Thus, we will consider ℓ^{p} spaces for 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞.
The pnorm thus defined on ℓ^{p} is indeed a norm, and ℓ^{p} together with this norm is a Banach space. The fully general L^{p} space is obtained — as seen below — by considering vectors, not only with finitely or countablyinfinitely many components, but with "arbitrarily many components"; in other words, functions. An integral instead of a sum is used to define the pnorm.
[edit]L^{p} spaces
Let 1 ≤ p < ∞ and (S, Σ, μ) be a measure space. Consider the set of all measurable functions from S to C (or R) whose absolute value raised to the pth power has finite integral, or equivalently, that
The set of such functions forms a vector space, with the following natural operations:
for every scalar λ.
That the sum of two p^{th} power integrable functions is again p^{th} power integrable follows from the inequality f + g^{p} ≤ 2^{p1} (f^{p} + g^{p}). In fact, more is true. Minkowski's inequalitysays the triangle inequality holds for  · _{p}. Thus the set of p^{th} power integrable functions, together with the function  · _{p}, is a seminormed vector space, which is denoted by .
This can be made into a normed vector space in a standard way; one simply takes the quotient space with respect to the kernel of  · _{p}. Since for any measurable function f, we have that f_{p} = 0 if and only if f = 0 almost everywhere, the kernel of  · _{p} does not depend upon p,
In the quotient space, two functions f and g are identified if f = g almost everywhere. The resulting normed vector space is, by definition,
For p = ∞, the space L^{∞}(S, μ) is defined as follows. We start with the set of all measurable functions from S to C (or R) which are essentially bounded, i.e. bounded up to a set of measure zero. Again two such functions are identified if they are equal almost everywhere. Denote this set by L^{∞}(S, μ). For f in L^{∞}(S, μ), its essential supremum serves as an appropriate norm:
As before, we have
if f ∈ L^{∞}(S, μ) ∩ L^{q}(S, μ) for some q < ∞.
For 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, L^{p}(S, μ) is a Banach space. The fact that L^{p} is complete is often referred to as RieszFischer theorem. Completeness can be checked using the convergence theorems for Lebesgue integrals.
When the underlying measure space S is understood, L^{p}(S, μ) is often abbreviated L^{p}(μ), or just L^{p}. The above definitions generalize to Bochner spaces.
[edit]Special cases
When p = 2; like the ℓ^{2} space, the space L^{2} is the only Hilbert space of this class. In the complex case, the inner product on L^{2} is defined by
The additional inner product structure allows for a richer theory, with applications to, for instance, Fourier series and quantum mechanics. Functions in L^{2} are sometimes calledquadratically integrable functions, squareintegrable functions or squaresummable functions, but sometimes these terms are reserved for functions that are squareintegrable in some other sense, such as in the sense of a Riemann integral (Titchmarsh 1976).
If we use complexvalued functions, the space L^{∞} is a commutative C*algebra with pointwise multiplication and conjugation. For many measure spaces, including all sigmafinite ones, it is in fact a commutative von Neumann algebra. An element of L^{∞} defines a bounded operator on any L^{p} space by multiplication.
The ℓ^{p} spaces (1 ≤ p ≤ ∞) are a special case of L^{p} spaces, when S is the set N of positive integers, and the measure μ is the counting measure on N. More generally, if one considers any set S with the counting measure, the resulting L^{ p} space is denoted ℓ^{p}(S). For example, the space ℓ^{p}(Z) is the space of all sequences indexed by the integers, and when defining the pnorm on such a space, one sums over all the integers. The space ℓ^{p}(n), where n is the set with n elements, is R^{n} with its pnorm as defined above. As any Hilbert space, every space L^{2} is linearly isometric to a suitable ℓ^{2}(I), where the cardinality of the set I is the cardinality of an arbitrary Hilbertian basis for this particular L^{2}.
[edit]Properties of L^{p} spaces
[edit]Dual spaces
The dual space (the space of all continuous linear functionals) of L^{p}(μ) for 1 < p < ∞ has a natural isomorphism with L^{q}(μ), where q is such that 1/p + 1/q = 1, which associates g ∈L^{q}(μ) with the functional κ_{p}(g) ∈ L^{p}(μ)^{∗} defined by
The fact that κ_{p}(g) is well defined and continuous follows from Hölder's inequality. The mapping κ_{p} is a linear mapping from L^{q}(μ) into L^{p}(μ)^{∗}, which is an isometry by the extremal case of Hölder's inequality. It is also possible to show (for example with the Radon–Nikodym theorem, see^{[3]}) that any G ∈ L^{p}(μ)^{∗} can be expressed this way: i.e., that κ_{p} is onto. Since κ_{p} is onto and isometric, it is an isomorphism of Banach spaces. With this (isometric) isomorphism in mind, it is usual to say simply that L^{q} "is" the dual of L^{p}.
When 1 < p < ∞, the space L^{p}(μ) is reflexive. Let κ_{p} be the above map and let κ_{q} be the corresponding linear isometry from L^{p}(μ) onto L^{q}(μ)^{∗}. The map
from L^{p}(μ) to L^{p}(μ)^{∗∗}, obtained by composing κ_{q} with the transpose (or adjoint) of the inverse of κ_{p}, coincides with the canonical embedding J of L^{p}(μ) into its bidual. Moreover, the map j_{p} is onto, as composition of two onto isometries, and this proves reflexivity.
If the measure μ on S is sigmafinite, then the dual of L^{1}(μ) is isometrically isomorphic to L^{∞}(μ) (more precisely, the map κ_{1} corresponding to p = 1 is an isometry from L^{∞}(μ) ontoL^{1}(μ)^{∗}).
The dual of L^{∞} is subtler. Elements of (L^{∞}(μ))^{∗} can be identified with bounded signed finitely additive measures on S that are absolutely continuous with respect to μ. See ba spacefor more details. If we assume the axiom of choice, this space is much bigger than L^{1}(μ) except in some trivial cases. However, there are relatively consistent extensions of ZermeloFraenkel set theory in which the dual of ℓ^{∞} is ℓ^{1}. This is a result of Shelah, discussed in Eric Schechter's book Handbook of Analysis and its Foundations.
[edit]Embeddings
Colloquially, if 1 ≤ p < q ≤ ∞, L^{p}(S, μ) contains functions that are more locally singular, while elements of L^{q}(S, μ) can be more spread out. Consider the Lebesgue measure on the half line (0, ∞). A continuous function in L^{1} might blow up near 0 but must decay sufficiently fast toward infinity. On the other hand, continuous functions in L^{∞} need not decay at all but no blowup is allowed. The precise technical result is the following:
 Let 0 ≤ p < q ≤ ∞. L^{q}(S, μ) is contained in L^{p}(S, μ) iff S does not contain sets of arbitrarily large measure, and
 Let 0 ≤ p < q ≤ ∞. L^{p}(S, μ) is contained in L^{q}(S, μ) iff S does not contain sets of arbitrarily small nonzero measure.
In particular, if the domain S has finite measure, the bound (a consequence of Jensen's inequality)
means the space L^{q} is continuously embedded in L^{p}. That is to say, the identity operator is a bounded linear map from L^{q} to L^{p}. The constant appearing in the above inequality is optimal, in the sense that the operator norm of the identity I : L^{q}(S, μ) → L^{p}(S, μ) is precisely
the case of equality being achieved exactly when f = 1 a.e.[μ].
[edit]Dense subspaces
It is assumed that 1 ≤ p < ∞ throughout this section.
Let (S, Σ, μ) be a measure space. An integrable simple function f on S is one of the form
where a_{j} is scalar and A_{j} ∈ Σ has finite measure, for j = 1, …, n. By construction of the integral, the vector space of integrable simple functions is dense in L^{p}(S, Σ, μ).
More can be said when S is a metrizable topological space and Σ its Borel σ–algebra, i.e., the smallest σ–algebra of subsets of S containing the open sets.
Suppose that V ⊂ S is an open set with μ(V) < ∞. It can be proved that for every Borel set A ∈ Σ contained in V, and for every ε > 0, there exist a closed set F and an open set U such that
It follows that there exists φ continuous on S such that
If S can be covered by an increasing sequence (V_{n}) of open sets that have finite measure, then the space of p–integrable continuous functions is dense in L^{p}(S, Σ, μ). More precisely, one can use bounded continuous functions that vanish outside one of the open sets V_{n}.
This applies in particular when S = R^{d} and when μ is the Lebesgue measure. The space of continuous and compactly supported functions is dense in L^{p}(R^{d}). Similarly, the space of integrable step functions is dense in L^{p}(R^{d}); this space is the linear span of indicator functions of bounded intervals when d = 1, of bounded rectangles when d = 2 and more generally of products of bounded intervals.
Several properties of general functions in L^{p}(R^{d}) are first proved for continuous and compactly supported functions (sometimes for step functions), then extended by density to all functions. For example, it is proved this way that translations are continuous on L^{p}(R^{d}), in the following sense: for every f ∈ L^{p}(R^{d}),
when t ∈ R^{d} tends to 0, where is the translated function defined by .
[edit]Applications
L^{p} spaces are widely used in mathematics and applications.
[edit]Hausdorff–Young inequality
The Fourier transform for the real line (resp. for periodic functions, cf. Fourier series) maps L^{p}(R) to L^{q}(R) (resp. L^{p}(T) to ℓ^{q}), where 1 ≤ p ≤ 2 and 1/p + 1/q = 1. This is a consequence of the RieszThorin interpolation theorem, and is made precise with the Hausdorff–Young inequality.
By contrast, if p > 2, the Fourier transform does not map into L^{q}.
[edit]Hilbert spaces
Hilbert spaces are central to many applications, from quantum mechanics to stochastic calculus. The spaces L^{2} and ℓ^{2} are both Hilbert spaces. In fact, by choosing a Hilbert basis, one sees that all Hilbert spaces are isometric to ℓ^{2}(E), where E is a set with an appropriate cardinality.
[edit]Statistics
In statistics, measures of central tendency and statistical dispersion, such as the mean, median, and standard deviation, are defined in terms of L^{p} metrics, and measures of central tendency can be characterized as solutions to variational problems.
[edit]L^{p} for 0 < p < 1
Let (S, Σ, μ) be a measure space. If 0 < p < 1, then L^{p}(μ) can be defined as above: it is the vector space of those measurable functions f such that
 .
As before, we may introduce the pnorm  f _{p} = N_{p}(f)^{1/p}, but  · _{p} does not satisfy the triangle inequality in this case, and defines only a quasinorm. The inequality (a + b)^{p} ≤a^{p} + b^{p}, valid for a ≥ 0 and b ≥ 0 implies that (Rudin 1991, §1.47)
and so the function
is a metric on L^{p}(μ). The resulting metric space is complete; the verification is similar to the familiar case when p ≥ 1.
In this setting L^{p} satisfies a reverse Minkowski inequality, that is for u and v in L^{p}
This result may be used to prove Clarkson's inequalities, which are in turn used to establish the uniform convexity of the spaces L^{p} for 1 < p < ∞ (Adams & Fournier 2003).
The space L^{p} for 0 < p < 1 is an Fspace: it admits a complete translationinvariant metric with respect to which the vector space operations are continuous. It is also locally bounded, much like the case p ≥ 1. It is the prototypical example of an Fspace that, for most reasonable measure spaces, is not locally convex: in ℓ^{p} or L^{p}([0, 1]), every open convex set containing the 0 function is unbounded for the pquasinorm; therefore, the 0 vector does not possess a fundamental system of convex neighborhoods. Specifically, this is true if the measure space S contains an infinite family of disjoint measurable sets of finite positive measure.
The only nonempty convex open set in L^{p}([0, 1]) is the entire space (Rudin 1991, §1.47). As a particular consequence, there are no nonzero linear functionals on L^{p}([0, 1]): the dual space is the zero space. In the case of the counting measure on the natural numbers (producing the sequence space L^{p}(μ) = ℓ^{p}), the bounded linear functionals on ℓ^{p} are exactly those that are bounded on ℓ^{1}, namely those given by sequences in ℓ^{∞}. Although ℓ^{p} does contain nontrivial convex open sets, it fails to have enough of them to give a base for the topology.
The situation of having no linear functionals is highly undesirable for the purposes of doing analysis. In the case of the Lebesgue measure on R^{n}, rather than work with L^{p} for 0 < p < 1, it is common to work with the Hardy space H^{p} whenever possible, as this has quite a few linear functionals: enough to distinguish points from one another. However, the Hahn–Banach theorem still fails in H^{p} for p < 1 (Duren 1970, §7.5).
[edit]L^{0}, the space of measurable functions
The vector space of (equivalence classes of) measurable functions on (S, Σ, μ) is denoted L^{0}(S, Σ, μ) (Kalton, Peck & Roberts 1984). By definition, it contains all the L^{p}, and is equipped with the topology of convergence in measure. When μ is a probability measure (i.e., μ(S) = 1), this mode of convergence is named convergence in probability. The description is easier when μ is finite.
If μ is a finite measure on (S, Σ), the 0 function admits for the convergence in measure the following fundamental system of neighborhoods
The topology can be defined by any metric d of the form
where φ is bounded continuous concave and nondecreasing on [0, ∞), with φ(0) = 0 and φ(t) > 0 when t > 0 (for example, φ(t) = min(t, 1)). Such a metric is called Lévymetric for L^{0}. Under this metric the space L^{0} is complete (it is again an Fspace). The space L^{0} is in general not locally bounded, and not locally convex.
For the infinite Lebesgue measure λ on R^{n}, the definition of the fundamental system of neighborhoods could be modified as follows
The resulting space L^{0}(R^{n}, λ) coincides as topological vector space with L^{0}(R^{n}, g(x) dλ(x)), for any positive λ–integrable density g.
[edit]Weak L^{p}
Let (S, Σ, μ) be a measure space, and f a measurable function with real or complex values on S. The distribution function of f is defined for t > 0 by
If f is in L^{p}(S, μ) for some p with 1 ≤ p < ∞, then by Markov's inequality,
A function f is said to be in the space weak L^{p}(S, μ), or L^{p,w}(S, μ), if there is a constant C > 0 such that, for all t > 0,
The best constant C for this inequality is the L^{p,w}norm of f, and is denoted by
The weak L^{p} coincide with the Lorentz spaces L^{p,∞}, so this notation is also used to denote them.
The L^{p,w}norm is not a true norm, since the triangle inequality fails to hold. Nevertheless, for f in L^{p}(S, μ),
and in particular L^{p}(S, μ) ⊂ L^{p,w}(S, μ). Under the convention that two functions are equal if they are equal μ almost everywhere, then the spaces L^{p,w} are complete (Grafakos 2004).
For any 0 < r < p the expression
is comparable to the L^{p,w}norm. Further in the case p > 1, this expression defines a norm if r = 1. Hence for p > 1 the weak L^{p} spaces are Banach spaces (Grafakos 2004).
A major result that uses the L^{p,w}spaces is the Marcinkiewicz interpolation theorem, which has broad applications to harmonic analysis and the study of singular integrals.
[edit]Weighted L^{p} spaces
As before, consider a measure space (S, Σ, μ). Let be a measurable function. The wweighted L^{p} space is defined as L^{p}(S, w dμ), where w dμ means the measure ν defined by
or, in terms of the Radon–Nikodym derivative,
The norm for L^{p}(S, w dμ) is explicitly
As L^{p}spaces, the weighted spaces have nothing special, since L^{p}(S, w dμ) is equal to L^{p}(S, dν). But they are the natural framework for several results in harmonic analysis (Grafakos 2004); they appear for example in the Muckenhoupt theorem: for 1 < p < ∞, the classical Hilbert transform is defined on L^{p}(T, λ) where T denotes the unit circle and λ the Lebesgue measure; the (nonlinear) Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator is bounded on L^{p}(R^{n}, λ). Muckenhoupt's theorem describes weights w such that the Hilbert transform remains bounded on L^{p}(T, w dλ) and the maximal operator on L^{p}(R^{n}, w dλ).
[edit]L^{p} spaces on manifolds
One may also define spaces on a manifold, called the intrinsic L^{p} spaces of the manifold, using densities.
[edit]See also
 Birnbaum–Orlicz space
 Hardy space
 Hölder mean
 Hölder space
 Root mean square
 Locally integrable function
 spaces over a locally compact group
[edit]Notes
 ^ Rolewicz, Stefan (1987), Functional analysis and control theory: Linear systems, Mathematics and its Applications (East European Series), 29 (Translated from the Polish by Ewa Bednarczuk ed.), Dordrecht; Warsaw: D. Reidel Publishing Co.; PWN—Polish Scientific Publishers, pp. xvi+524, ISBN 9027721866, MR 920371, OCLC 13064804
 ^ Maddox, I.J. (1988), Elements of Functional Analysis (2nd ed.), Cambridge: CUP, page 16
 ^ Rudin, Walter (1980), Real and Complex Analysis (2rd ed.), New Delhi: Tata McGrawHill, Theorem 6.16
[edit]References
 Adams, Robert A.; Fournier, John F. (2003), Sobolev Spaces (Second ed.), Academic Press, ISBN 9780120441433.
 Bourbaki, Nicolas (1987), Topological vector spaces, Elements of mathematics, Berlin: SpringerVerlag, ISBN 9783540136279.
 DiBenedetto, Emmanuele (2002), Real analysis, Birkhäuser, ISBN 3764342315.
 Dunford, Nelson; Schwartz, Jacob T. (1958), Linear operators, volume I, WileyInterscience.
 Duren, P. (1970), Theory of H^{p}Spaces, New York: Academic Press
 Grafakos, Loukas (2004), Classical and Modern Fourier Analysis, Pearson Education, Inc., pp. 253–257, ISBN 013035399X.
 Hewitt, Edwin; Stromberg, Karl (1965), Real and abstract analysis, SpringerVerlag.
 Kalton, Nigel J.; Peck, N. Tenney; Roberts, James W. (1984), An Fspace sampler, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 89, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521275857, MR 808777
 Riesz, Frigyes (1910), "Untersuchungen über Systeme integrierbarer Funktionen", Mathematische Annalen 69 (4): 449–497, doi:10.1007/BF01457637
 Rudin, Walter (1991), Functional Analysis, McGrawHill Science/Engineering/Math, ISBN 9780070542365
 Rudin, Walter (1987), Real and complex analysis (3rd ed.), New York: McGrawHill, ISBN 9780070542341, MR 924157
 Titchmarsh, EC (1976), The theory of functions, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780198533498
[edit]External links